@adbenitez Wikipedia is pretty great. If a topic holds encyclopaedic significance, a page on it won’t be removed. This can be easily backed up by a few references such as news articles.
Beeper was all over the news, so the issue there is not lack of significance, but lack of citations.
You most certainly do not need to have special connections in order to contribute.
@ee yet it was added with lack of citation, while the article about Delta Chat contained several citations among them important media outlets etc. but then "you need more" etc. while for Beeper 1 was enough, maybe you could try submitting an entry
@adbenitez I did create pages, several times, successfully.
Delta is just not significant, or you failed to prove so. The Beeper article has many relevant citations that back its significance. That it didn’t have a lot of sources at first, is an seperate issue.
Do you have a link to the page you created on Delta? I’d like to see it, maybe I am wrong and it was a great article. (P.s. even removed articles are viewable in the edit history, if I’m not mistaken.)
@ee it was not me, and checking now the draft was completely removed, I think it was https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Delta_Chat but I don't remember well since I can't find it anymore
@adbenitez @ee it can be found in archive.org
https://web.archive.org/web/20241215003412/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Delta_Chat
